[FAB-4438] Fix race condition in mock WriteBlock

WriteBlockVal could get overwritten before the listener on the Batches
channel had a chance to retrieve it. This changeset fixes this by
replacing the Batches channel with a Blocks channel.

Change-Id: Idc8899a4317a1c2dc7f5b6affae1c42f24095117
Signed-off-by: Kostas Christidis <[email protected]>

Author: kchristidis

orderer/kafka/chain_test.go

@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularError(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularQueueEnvelope(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularCutBlock(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularCutBlock(t *testing.T) {
 	go func() { // Note: Unlike the CONNECT test case, the following does NOT introduce a race condition, so we're good
 		mockSupport.BlockCutterVal.Block <- struct{}{} // Let the `mockblockcutter.Ordered` call return
 		logger.Debugf("Mock blockcutter's Ordered call has returned")
-		<-mockSupport.Batches                                          // Let the `mockConsenterSupport.WriteBlock` proceed
+		<-mockSupport.Blocks                                           // Let the `mockConsenterSupport.WriteBlock` proceed
 		logger.Debug("Closing exitChan to exit the infinite for loop") // We are guaranteed to hit the exitChan branch after hitting the REGULAR branch at least once
 		close(exitChan)                                                // Identical to chain.Halt()
 		logger.Debug("exitChan closed")
@@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularCutTwoBlocks(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -614,15 +614,13 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularCutTwoBlocks(t *testing.T) {
 		logger.Debugf("Mock blockcutter's Ordered call has returned for the second time")
 
 		select {
-		case <-mockSupport.Batches: // Let the `mockConsenterSupport.WriteBlock` proceed
-			block1 = mockSupport.WriteBlockVal
+		case block1 = <-mockSupport.Blocks: // Let the `mockConsenterSupport.WriteBlock` proceed
 		case <-time.After(hitBranch):
 			logger.Fatalf("Did not receive a block from the blockcutter as expected")
 		}
 
 		select {
-		case <-mockSupport.Batches:
-			block2 = mockSupport.WriteBlockVal
+		case block2 = <-mockSupport.Blocks:
 		case <-time.After(hitBranch):
 			logger.Fatalf("Did not receive a block from the blockcutter as expected")
 		}
@@ -677,7 +675,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularAndSendTimeToCutRegular(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -746,7 +744,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopRegularAndSendTimeToCutError(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -801,7 +799,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopTimeToCutFromReceivedMessageRegular(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -818,7 +816,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopTimeToCutFromReceivedMessageRegular(t *testing.T) {
 	mockSupport.BlockCutterVal.Ordered(newMockEnvelope("fooMessage"))
 
 	go func() { // Note: Unlike the CONNECT test case, the following does NOT introduce a race condition, so we're good
-		<-mockSupport.Batches                                          // Let the `mockConsenterSupport.WriteBlock` proceed
+		<-mockSupport.Blocks                                           // Let the `mockConsenterSupport.WriteBlock` proceed
 		logger.Debug("Closing exitChan to exit the infinite for loop") // We are guaranteed to hit the exitChan branch after hitting the REGULAR branch at least once
 		close(exitChan)                                                // Identical to chain.Halt()
 		logger.Debug("exitChan closed")
@@ -858,7 +856,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopTimeToCutFromReceivedMessageZeroBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -902,7 +900,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopTimeToCutFromReceivedMessageLargerThanExpected(t *testing.T)
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call
@@ -948,7 +946,7 @@ func TestProcessLoopTimeToCutFromReceivedMessageStale(t *testing.T) {
 	assert.NoError(t, err, "Expected no error when setting up the mock partition consumer")
 
 	mockSupport := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:        make(chan []*cb.Envelope), // WriteBlock will post here
+		Blocks:         make(chan *cb.Block), // WriteBlock will post here
 		BlockCutterVal: mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		ChainIDVal:     mockChannel.topic(),
 		HeightVal:      lastCutBlockNumber, // Incremented during the WriteBlock call

orderer/mocks/multichain/multichain.go

@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ type ConsenterSupport struct {
 	// BlockCutterVal is the value returned by BlockCutter()
 	BlockCutterVal *mockblockcutter.Receiver
 
-	// Batches is the channel which WriteBlock writes data to
-	Batches chan []*cb.Envelope
+	// Blocks is the channel where WriteBlock writes the most recently created block
+	Blocks chan *cb.Block
 
 	// ChainIDVal is the value returned by ChainID()
 	ChainIDVal string
@@ -50,9 +50,6 @@ type ConsenterSupport struct {
 
 	// NextBlockVal stores the block created by the most recent CreateNextBlock() call
 	NextBlockVal *cb.Block
-
-	// WriteBlockVal stores the block created by the most recent WriteBlock() call
-	WriteBlockVal *cb.Block
 }
 
 // BlockCutter returns BlockCutterVal
@@ -77,20 +74,14 @@ func (mcs *ConsenterSupport) CreateNextBlock(data []*cb.Envelope) *cb.Block {
 	return block
 }
 
-// WriteBlock writes data to the Batches channel
+// WriteBlock writes data to the Blocks channel
 // Note that _committers is ignored by this mock implementation
 func (mcs *ConsenterSupport) WriteBlock(block *cb.Block, _committers []filter.Committer, encodedMetadataValue []byte) *cb.Block {
-	logger.Debugf("mockWriter: attempting to write batch")
-	umtxs := make([]*cb.Envelope, len(block.Data.Data))
-	for i := range block.Data.Data {
-		umtxs[i] = utils.UnmarshalEnvelopeOrPanic(block.Data.Data[i])
-	}
-	mcs.HeightVal++
 	if encodedMetadataValue != nil {
 		block.Metadata.Metadata[cb.BlockMetadataIndex_ORDERER] = utils.MarshalOrPanic(&cb.Metadata{Value: encodedMetadataValue})
 	}
-	mcs.WriteBlockVal = block
-	mcs.Batches <- umtxs
+	mcs.HeightVal++
+	mcs.Blocks <- block
 	return block
 }
 

orderer/solo/consensus_test.go

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ func goWithWait(target func()) *waitableGo {
 func TestEmptyBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	batchTimeout, _ := time.ParseDuration("1ms")
 	support := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:         make(chan []*cb.Envelope),
+		Blocks:          make(chan *cb.Block),
 		BlockCutterVal:  mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		SharedConfigVal: &mockconfig.Orderer{BatchTimeoutVal: batchTimeout},
 	}
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ func TestEmptyBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	syncQueueMessage(testMessage, bs, support.BlockCutterVal)
 	bs.Halt()
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 		t.Fatalf("Expected no invocations of Append")
 	case <-wg.done:
 	}
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ func TestEmptyBatch(t *testing.T) {
 func TestBatchTimer(t *testing.T) {
 	batchTimeout, _ := time.ParseDuration("1ms")
 	support := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:         make(chan []*cb.Envelope),
+		Blocks:          make(chan *cb.Block),
 		BlockCutterVal:  mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		SharedConfigVal: &mockconfig.Orderer{BatchTimeoutVal: batchTimeout},
 	}
@@ -90,21 +90,21 @@ func TestBatchTimer(t *testing.T) {
 	syncQueueMessage(testMessage, bs, support.BlockCutterVal)
 
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 	case <-time.After(time.Second):
 		t.Fatalf("Expected a block to be cut because of batch timer expiration but did not")
 	}
 
 	syncQueueMessage(testMessage, bs, support.BlockCutterVal)
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 	case <-time.After(time.Second):
 		t.Fatalf("Did not create the second batch, indicating that the timer was not appopriately reset")
 	}
 
 	bs.Halt()
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 		t.Fatalf("Expected no invocations of Append")
 	case <-wg.done:
 	}
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ func TestBatchTimer(t *testing.T) {
 func TestBatchTimerHaltOnFilledBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	batchTimeout, _ := time.ParseDuration("1h")
 	support := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:         make(chan []*cb.Envelope),
+		Blocks:          make(chan *cb.Block),
 		BlockCutterVal:  mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		SharedConfigVal: &mockconfig.Orderer{BatchTimeoutVal: batchTimeout},
 	}
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ func TestBatchTimerHaltOnFilledBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	syncQueueMessage(testMessage, bs, support.BlockCutterVal)
 
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 	case <-time.After(time.Second):
 		t.Fatalf("Expected a block to be cut because the batch was filled, but did not")
 	}
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ func TestBatchTimerHaltOnFilledBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	syncQueueMessage(testMessage, bs, support.BlockCutterVal)
 
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 	case <-time.After(time.Second):
 		t.Fatalf("Did not create the second batch, indicating that the old timer was still running")
 	}
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ func TestBatchTimerHaltOnFilledBatch(t *testing.T) {
 func TestConfigStyleMultiBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	batchTimeout, _ := time.ParseDuration("1h")
 	support := &mockmultichain.ConsenterSupport{
-		Batches:         make(chan []*cb.Envelope),
+		Blocks:          make(chan *cb.Block),
 		BlockCutterVal:  mockblockcutter.NewReceiver(),
 		SharedConfigVal: &mockconfig.Orderer{BatchTimeoutVal: batchTimeout},
 	}
@@ -170,13 +170,13 @@ func TestConfigStyleMultiBatch(t *testing.T) {
 	syncQueueMessage(testMessage, bs, support.BlockCutterVal)
 
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 	case <-time.After(time.Second):
 		t.Fatalf("Expected two blocks to be cut but never got the first")
 	}
 
 	select {
-	case <-support.Batches:
+	case <-support.Blocks:
 	case <-time.After(time.Second):
 		t.Fatalf("Expected the config type tx to create two blocks, but only go the first")
 	}