Skip to content

Code Quality Improvements Needed in LG._link_drops Function #304

Open
@sourcery-ai

Description

The Sourcery AI bot has identified several code quality issues in the LG._link_drops function that need to be addressed to improve the overall quality and maintainability of the codebase. The issues found include:

  1. Replace identity comprehension with call to collection constructor: This involves converting list/set/tuple comprehensions that do not change the input elements into direct calls to collection constructors. For example, instead of using [item for item in coll], use list(coll).

  2. Use named expression to simplify assignment and conditional: This can help in reducing redundancy and improving readability by using the new assignment expression feature (the walrus operator :=).

  3. Simplify dictionary access using default get: This involves using the get method with a default value to simplify dictionary access and avoid potential KeyError exceptions.

  4. Low code quality in LG._link_drops: The function has a quality score of 13%, which is below the acceptable threshold of 25%. This score is based on factors such as method length, cognitive complexity, and working memory.

Suggested Actions:

  • Refactor the LG._link_drops function to make it shorter and more readable. Aim to reduce the function length by extracting pieces of functionality into their own functions.
  • Reduce nesting by introducing guard clauses to return early where possible.
  • Ensure that variables are tightly scoped, so that related code is grouped together within the function.

These improvements should be addressed as part of a larger code quality improvement effort. A separate ticket will be raised to track these changes and ensure they are implemented effectively. This will help in maintaining a clean and efficient codebase.

For more details on the specific issues, refer to the Sourcery documentation.


I created this issue for @myxie from #300 (comment).

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Generate a plan of action: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on this issue.
  • Generate a pull request for this issue: Comment @sourcery-ai develop to
    generate a PR that addresses this issue.

Getting Help

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions