fix: unsupported param type url.URL #584
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@ddl-ebrown has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes enhance the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #584 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.78% 92.79% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 22 22
Lines 3894 3902 +8
==========================================
+ Hits 3613 3621 +8
Misses 236 236
Partials 45 45 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
huma.go (1)
1131-1140: Approve the new functionality for handlingurl.URLtypes.The added code segment correctly parses
url.URLtypes and sets the parsed value to the field. It also appropriately adds an error message to the response if parsing fails.However, as indicated by the static analysis hints, this new functionality lacks test coverage. It's crucial to add tests to ensure the robustness and reliability of the URL parsing logic.
Do you want me to assist in writing tests for this functionality or create a GitHub issue to track the task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1133-1136: huma.go#L1133-L1136
Added lines #L1133 - L1136 were not covered by tests
[warning] 1138-1140: huma.go#L1138-L1140
Added lines #L1138 - L1140 were not covered by tests
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- huma.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
huma.go
[warning] 1133-1136: huma.go#L1133-L1136
Added lines #L1133 - L1136 were not covered by tests
[warning] 1138-1140: huma.go#L1138-L1140
Added lines #L1138 - L1140 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (1)
huma.go (1)
1138-1140: This code segment is part of the previous code segment reviewed, and the lack of test coverage is already addressed in the previous review comment.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1138-1140: huma.go#L1138-L1140
Added lines #L1138 - L1140 were not covered by tests
ddl-ebrown
force-pushed
the
add-url-param-support
branch
from
f8f175b to
73191d4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
huma.go (1)
1138-1140: Add test coverage for the newly added code.The static analysis tool
codecov/patchindicates that the added lines 1138-1140 are not covered by tests. To ensure the correctness of theurl.URLhandling and prevent potential bugs or regressions, please add appropriate test cases that exercise this new code path.Do you want me to generate the test code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1138-1140: huma.go#L1138-L1140
Added lines #L1138 - L1140 were not covered by testshuma_test.go (2)
Line range hint
4-4: Reminder: Address the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates that tests are missing for this function. Please ensure that the function is thoroughly tested to confirm that it behaves as expected.
Do you want me to generate the unit testing code or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
12-24: Consider adjusting the fee structure or discount policy.The implementation of a flat $20 fee on discounted bills could negate the benefit of the discount, especially for smaller purchases or marginal loyalty tiers. This might lead to customer dissatisfaction, as the intent to reward loyalty paradoxically increases the bill.
Consider revising either the discount percentages or the flat fee application to better align with customer incentives.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- huma.go (2 hunks)
- huma_test.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
huma.go
[warning] 1138-1140: huma.go#L1138-L1140
Added lines #L1138 - L1140 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
huma.go (1)
1132-1140: LGTM! The code correctly handles theurl.URLtype.The changes enhance the
Registerfunction to parse and validate theurl.URLtype, which is important for applications that rely on URL inputs. The code looks good and handles the parsing and error cases appropriately.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 1138-1140: huma.go#L1138-L1140
Added lines #L1138 - L1140 were not covered by testshuma_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-2: LGTM!The function logic is correct, and the implementation is accurate.
ddl-ebrown
force-pushed
the
add-url-param-support
branch
from
73191d4 to
f78f9d5
Compare
ddl-ebrown
force-pushed
the
add-url-param-support
branch
from
f78f9d5 to
19b90da
Compare
| }, | ||
| Method: http.MethodGet, | ||
| URL: "/test-params/foo/123/fba4f46b-4539-4d19-8e3f-a0e629a243b5?string=bar&int=456&before=2023-01-01T12:00:00Z&date=2023-01-01&uint=1&bool=true&strings=foo,bar&ints=2,3&ints8=4,5&ints16=4,5&ints32=4,5&ints64=4,5&uints=1,2&uints16=10,15&uints32=10,15&uints64=10,15&floats32=2.2,2.3&floats64=3.2,3.3&exploded=foo&exploded=bar", | ||
| URL: "/test-params/foo/123/fba4f46b-4539-4d19-8e3f-a0e629a243b5?string=bar&int=456&before=2023-01-01T12:00:00Z&date=2023-01-01&url=http%3A%2F%2Ffoo.com%2Fbar&uint=1&bool=true&strings=foo,bar&ints=2,3&ints8=4,5&ints16=4,5&ints32=4,5&ints64=4,5&uints=1,2&uints16=10,15&uints32=10,15&uints64=10,15&floats32=2.2,2.3&floats64=3.2,3.3&exploded=foo&exploded=bar", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I hope these parsing tests are sufficient @danielgtaylor.
| @@ -1127,6 +1128,16 @@ func Register[I, O any](api API, op Operation, handler func(context.Context, *I) | |||
| f.Set(reflect.ValueOf(t)) | |||
| pv = value | |||
| break | |||
| // Special case: url.URL | |||
| } else if f.Type() == urlType { | |||
| u, err := url.Parse(value) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tested this in my previously failing app and all is good now
ddl-ebrown
changed the title
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Registerfunction to support and validateurl.URLtypes, ensuring proper handling of URL inputs.Bug Fixes