website: getting started site lists the packages weird

[tom-wegener]

I'm running staticcheck with multiple different systems and sometimes I have to install it on a new distro and every time I'm checking which name is the right name for the package manager I'm using I get confused. I'm confused because the name is not always under the distribution/package manager name and expecially for fedora the name is on the next column on the top.
The list could be one of the following options

• two columns, every entry is [package manager] [name of staticcheck package]
• two rows with manager on top and name at the bottom row

[dominikh]

Feel free to send a patch. Two columns sounds fine.

[tom-wegener]

Is there an easy way to just see how the site looks while developing, hugo (version 0.110.0) throws errors and exits with error code 255. And sadly I'm no hugo-expert. I could also look into #1570 ?

The error logs:

WARN 2024/08/28 17:26:33 Module "docsy" is not compatible with this Hugo version; run "hugo mod graph" for more information.
Start building sites … 
hugo v0.110.0 linux/amd64 BuildDate=unknown
WARNING: calling IsSet with unsupported type "invalid" (<nil>) will always return false.
Error: Error building site: TOCSS: failed to transform "scss/main.scss" (text/x-scss). Check your Hugo installation; you need the extended version to build SCSS/SASS with transpiler set to 'libsass'.: this feature is not available in your current Hugo version, see https://goo.gl/YMrWcn for more information
Built in 102 ms
exit status 255

[dominikh]

#1570 is non-trivial and probably requires a bunch of decisions from my end. The error emitted by Hugo is a red hearing and slightly incorrect and most likely caused by not having the postcss CLI in PATH. The warnings can be ignored, luckily.

[dominikh]

And please don't feel obligated to work on this. I know that the website is a bit of a pain to work on.

[tom-wegener]

I would love to fix this and I changed some things but I just want to see the changes before committing/making a pr.

Anyway I'm happy to (try to) help and I'll see if I can fix this myself.
(And as an offer: Since most of the files are markdown I could try to migrate everything to astro/starlight, and try to keep most of it like it is but I fully understand if that's not your focus atm and if you want to do the migration yourself)

[dominikh]

Thank you for the offer, but I don't intent to switch to another framework.