-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scripts+make+GH: Add simple backwards compatibility test to the CI #9540
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
TODO(elle): will need to update the various test docker compose files in the `docker` folder.
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
TODO: because of the entrypoint change to I was having lots of trouble just getting those compose files to run as is though... so will first need to adjust them to actually work with current LND code (they currently break at the "check taproot compat" step due to cert issues) and then they can be updated. |
In this PR, a simple backwards compatibility test script is added to the repo & it is added as a CI step.
Test description:
Perform basic tests to ensure that Bob can send, receive and route.
Shutdown Bob & restart it but this time with the version of the code in the current PR
More info:
See the added
README.md
for more info about the script & how to play around with it locally.Running it:
You can test this locally simply by running:
make backwards-compat-test
Example of passing itests but failing backwards compat test
See this PR which demonstrates a case where the bug introduced
by the PR is not caught by itests or unit tests but is caught by the backwards compatibility test.
The output of the CI step looks as follows:
Example Success Output (see this PR's CI):