Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add keep operator as deanonymizer #1255

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

Add keep operator as deanonymizer #1255

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

dinigo
Copy link
Contributor

@dinigo dinigo commented Jan 12, 2024

Implements the keep operator for deanonymisation too.

It keeps all the methods from the Keep class and extends only the ones that return the type.

Concrete classes MUST subclass Operator type, since operator discovery is done with Operator.__subclasses__()

This PR fixes issue #1254

Checklist

  • I have reviewed the contribution guidelines
  • I have signed the CLA (if required)
  • My code includes unit tests
  • All unit tests and lint checks pass locally
  • My PR contains documentation updates / additions if required

@dinigo
Copy link
Contributor Author

dinigo commented Jan 12, 2024

Hello, I'm just creating this PR in case you (de core dev team) find it interesting. If so I'll pay a visit to the testing and other features

@dinigo
Copy link
Contributor Author

dinigo commented Jan 12, 2024

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

Copy link
Contributor

@omri374 omri374 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great addition! Left a couple of small comments.

@omri374
Copy link
Contributor

omri374 commented Jan 15, 2024

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@omri374
Copy link
Contributor

omri374 commented Jan 16, 2024

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@omri374 omri374 merged commit deb8f2b into microsoft:main Jan 16, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants