Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add information-only golint to test runs #12

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 20, 2018

Conversation

ascandella
Copy link
Contributor

And start fixing some golints

And start fixing some golints
Copy link
Contributor

@erickearns erickearns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Presumably this enables the linting and addresses all errors?

@ascandella
Copy link
Contributor Author

It doesn't address all of them (there are about 30 left), I decided I'd fix those in a future diff to avoid massively conflicting with the other PRs I have open. Should be able to do it soon though (and then we can turn them from warnings into errors if we want).

@ascandella ascandella merged commit d8bed74 into singnet:master Jul 20, 2018
@ascandella ascandella deleted the vet-etc branch July 20, 2018 20:17
vsbogd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2019
updating master of my fork
elmiringos added a commit to elmiringos/snet-daemon that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
* feat(training): add public model storage

* test(training): add unit test for public model storage

* feat(training/storage): add methods to update publicModelIds and pendingModelIds

* test(training/storage): add TestPendingModelStorage_AddPendingModelId and TestPublicModelStorage_AddPublicModelId

* feat(training/service): add public models handling in verifySignerHasAccessToTheModel, update createModelDetails

* test(training): add usage newTrainingService instead of NewDaemonService
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants