Skip to content

Documentation: the "Known bugs" webpage https://xiph.org/flac/documentation_bugs.html #819

Open
@H2Swine

Description

@H2Swine

The only bug listed is a behaviour that has later been changed because it doesn't make sense to even write seekpoints?

flac hasn't adhered to the tradition of listing known bugs in the man document, so that makes a case for such a webpage. I do think though, that several of the issues users may have are not outright bugs. Like how 1.4.0 rejects out-of-range signals (while some of these files, which do violate the spec, are even decoded as intended with 1.2.1) or ID3 tags. Users could be advised to try the application that wrote an offending file, to decode it and then listen carefully to the output (at low volume first).

I might try to draft such a text if it is welcome.

Apart from that, what are the known bugs? Inconsistent ".aifc" handling, and issue #808 if verified?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions